criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
criminal law cases 2018 - An Overview
Blog Article
five. Uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General along with counsel for your complainant further argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led on the recovery of sleeping pills on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has become generated before the Court wherein the sleeping supplements were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected inside the liver although not during the stomach. For this reason, the recovery of said sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Realized Deputy Prosecutor General and also counsel to the complainant have also argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Bhoora led for the recovery of a motorcycle.
ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming for the main case, It's also a nicely-established proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to reach a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty from the charge, however, that is matter to your procedure provided under the relevant rules and never otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to reach at its independent findings around the evidence.
4. It's been noticed by this Court that there is a delay of sooner or later during the registration of FIR which has not been explained through the complainant. Moreover, there is not any eye-witness of your alleged occurrence plus the prosecution is relying on the witnesses of extra judicial confession. The evidence of extra judicial confession from the petitioners has long been tendered by Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram through their statements recorded under Section 161, Cr.P.C., on 06.02.2018. Both of them namely Ghulam Dastigir and Mohammad Akram happened for being the real brothers with the deceased but they did not react in the least towards the confessional statements from the petitioners and calmly noticed them leaving, a person after the other, without even moving an inch. They have not mentioned in their statements that the accused held some weapon when they visited them to confess their guilt about the murder of Ghulam Farid which could have precluded these witnesses from apprehending the petitioners. Their conduct does not look much inspiring or natural. The petitioner, namely, Mst. Mubeena Bibi was arrested on fourteen.02.2018 and there is not any explanation concerning why her arrest wasn't effected after making with the alleged extra judicial confession. It's been held on so many occasions that extra judicial confession of the accused is a weak type of evidence which might be manoeuvred via the prosecution in any case where direct connecting evidence does not arrive their way. The prosecution is additionally counting on the evidence of Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal which is equally fragile, as both the witnesses Murid Hussain and Muhammad Afzal did not say a word regarding existence of some light within the place, where they allegedly noticed the petitioners collectively over a motorcycle at four.
Section 302 on the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value website of human life. The application of your death penalty or life imprisonment depends to the specifics of every case, including any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
record with the department there is not any record accessible whatsoever regarding promotion with the petitioner(Promotion)
Please use just one username and password established from the options. If it does not work please check out the other. Just about every allows single user access only - so please remember to log off properly when you have completed your session in Manupatra.
Retribution: Section 302 PPC also serves the purpose of retribution, where society seeks justice with the loss of the life. It allows the legal system to impose a proportional punishment over the offender, guaranteeing These are held accountable for their actions.
In fact, this provision nullifies the difference between manslaughter and murder. Section 318 with the Pakistan Penal Code 1860 defines Qatl-i-khata (manslaughter) as “Whoever, without intention to cause the death of or cause harm into a person causes death of such person, both by mistake of act or by mistake of fact is said to commit qatl-i-khata.”
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that when the act of misconduct is established as well as the employee is found guilty after thanks process of law, it's the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the varied penalties provided in law. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness of your act of misconduct is just not adequate although the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside a structured and lawful way. Read more
acquitted the appellants from many of the charges therefore the same is dismissed being infructuous. (Criminal Revision )
How much sway case regulation holds may differ by jurisdiction, and by the exact circumstances of the current case. To investigate this concept, take into account the following case legislation definition.
The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the practical application of this amendment and its probable to protected economic interests and maintain the integrity on the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of those changes is significant for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a strong legal system.
Acquittal nullifies prior guilt and fortifies petitioners' eligibility for appointment. No juridical impediment to appointment following acquittal. Equivalence of acquittals under compromise and criminal procedure code, as well as the role of "badal-i-sulh" in restorative justice. Distinction between probationary release and acquittal. Probationary release for a legally regarded conviction. Read more
Finding reliable free case legislation sites may be challenging. Many websites involve subscriptions or offer limited information. This article helps you navigate the landscape of free case legislation resources in Pakistan, offering you with a curated list of reliable and accessible platforms.